"We are who you are." That's it. No argument. No debate. Just a second line underneath: your family, your friends, your co-workers, your neighbors.

I didn't write that line. I'm going to tell you who did, and why I think what happened next explains something real about how minds change. Or don't.

It's back to school season, and this is the week to put one thing in front of a teacher you know. Empathy Week is a free, annual festival of films, storytelling, and classroom events that teaches empathy as a skill to students aged 5 to 18. It's reached schools in 58 countries. The 2027 edition runs March 8 through 12, the theme is "Building Better Relationships," and registration is open now at empathyweek.org.

Full disclosure: I'm not an official partner, I just think it's the real thing. If you know a teacher, a PTA lead, or a school administrator, please forward this to them. 

Those five words came from the writer and gay rights activist Paul Monette. I heard him speak at a public event in LA in the early nineties, and he said we needed to show straight people something simple: that we are who you are. Your friends, your family, your co-workers, your neighbors.

It wasn't an argument. He wasn't asking anyone to change their mind about anything. He was handing people a piece of information they may or may not have already known, or maybe just hadn't noticed: they already knew somebody who was gay.

Monette wrote many books. One of them, Becoming a Man: Half a Life Story, won the National Book Award in 1992, right around the time I was coming out. A friend handed me that book. His written words made me want to hear him speak. His spoken words made me want to do something.

I was getting involved with GLAAD around then (the Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation, back when it still spelled that out), partly because my parents had raised me to give back, and partly because I wanted the road to self-acceptance to be easier for the queer kids coming up behind me. I was working in Hollywood. GLAAD made sense.

Not long after hearing Monette, I suggested we build a bus bench campaign around his line, as both a visibility program and a fundraiser. We got the green light!

I may have been the lead volunteer, but I didn't do it alone. When it came time for the photo shoot, I put myself in front of the camera too. If I was going to ask other people to be visible, I needed to be willing to do it myself. Other volunteers stood in that photo with me, different races, different ethnicities, different genders, because the whole point was that this wasn't about one kind of person.

It was early 1994. The goal was simple: help people see us as everyday people. As humans. Because to change a society's ethics, and the morals of the individuals inside it, you first have to get people to see your humanity. To connect with you as a person. Yes, to have empathy.

We didn't run a study on that bench. I want to be honest about that. What I can tell you is that for months, people saw those benches as they drove around LA, and not just the liberal parts of LA. We were very intentional about putting the message in the parts of the city that needed a little encouragement. People saw it every day, and in those years before Ellen came out and Will & Grace went on the air, that mattered. We were not just the victims of an epidemic. We were not the stereotype. We were people you already knew.

The fundraiser was an adopt-a-bus-bench program. Make a donation, get an adoption certificate with the street location of your bench so you could go visit it. A colleague worked his Hollywood connections and got Harvey Fierstein to lend his voice: a letter written and signed by Harvey, asking people to give. It worked. We covered our costs and raised money on top of it.

A year later, in 1995, GLAAD partnered with The Center and Lambda Legal for the LA Pride parade, which back then ran through West Hollywood. We made hundreds of bright yellow signs that said one thing: Freedom to Marry. Same idea as the bench. We are who you are. We have the same hopes and dreams. We handed the signs to anybody who wanted one, every group walking that route that needed something to carry, and within minutes the whole parade was a sea of yellow.

We were so successful at it that when the LA Times covered the parade the next day, they wrote it up as if Freedom to Marry had been the official theme. It hadn't been. 1995 was Christopher Street West's 25th anniversary, and the official theme was "CSW: 25 Years of Pride." But the Times wasn't wrong about what they saw. We'd built it to be the one thing you couldn't miss, in every part of that parade, on purpose.

The timing lined up with the first marriage equality lawsuits to get real traction, starting with a case in Hawaii that the state's supreme court had ruled on in 1993. We had no idea if any of it would work. We just knew the message needed to be everywhere, to change hearts and minds outside our community and to galvanize our own. 

On episode five of What Does It Mean to Be Human, Maria and I spent an hour circling one question. Ethics are the rules a whole society agrees to enforce. Morals are the private conviction one person holds. So how does one ever become the other? How does something that starts as one person's belief end up as the law, or the governing behavior of a society?

I think that bench and those signs point at the mechanism. Here's the research that convinced me.

A psychologist named Gordon Allport proposed what's now called the contact hypothesis: direct contact between two groups reduces prejudice between them, but only under specific conditions. Equal status. A shared goal. Cooperation instead of competition. And some signal that the contact is sanctioned rather than transgressive.

Decades later, researchers Thomas Pettigrew and Linda Tropp tested that claim against 515 studies, 713 samples, and a quarter of a million people across 38 countries. In 94 percent of those samples, more contact meant less prejudice.

Now hold the bus bench copy up against Allport's list. "We are who you are" arrives with equal status built in. It's delivered flat, to a stranger who never asked for it and doesn't have to respond. It isn't a debate, so there's no competition. And it's sitting on a piece of city transit property, which is about as sanctioned as a message gets. Five words, most of Allport's conditions. Hundreds of identical yellow signs, held by people at a parade, work the same way. Repetition, not argument.

Here's the uncomfortable part. If contact works this well, we should be living through the best moment in human history for understanding each other. Thanks to social media, we're more exposed to people who disagree with us than any generation that's ever lived. Ten minutes of scrolling and you'll find someone who thinks you're wrong about everything.

A sociologist named Chris Bail studied what happens when you put people in front of opposing political views on social media, and found close to the opposite of what you'd expect. In some cases, exposure made polarization worse, not better. His explanation: moderate voices mostly opt out of posting, because it's exhausting to put a moderate opinion into a hostile feed. So what you actually encounter skews toward the loudest, most extreme voices on the other side, and you mistake those voices for what the whole other side believes.

Run that through Allport's conditions. A stranger's most hostile post is not equal status. There's no shared goal, no cooperation, and no institution standing behind the exchange telling you this is safe ground. It's exposure with none of the conditions that make contact work. We've been treating a decline in real contact as if it were a decline in exposure. It was never the same thing. We're getting more exposure than ever. What we've lost is the contact.

I spent most of my career in marketing research, so here's where this lands for me professionally. Marketers and business leaders need to meet their consumers as people, not as data points. That's the only thing that minimizes the mystery: learning where you're actually the same and where you're actually different. A data point can tell you what a thousand people did. It can't tell you what any one of them was thinking when they did it. The moment you mistake the data point for the person, you've lost the thing that bus bench taught me.

It's also why a program I run with Dig Insights, a game we call Lifeology, works the way it does. Consumers and business leaders sit in the same room and play together. Equal status, because nobody is the executive and nobody is the "lowly consumer." A shared goal, because everyone is there to get to know each other as people. Cooperation, because you're sharing stories, not scoring points. And it's sanctioned, because an institution is hosting it and saying this is what we're here to do. That's Allport's four conditions on purpose, and it's how you change how a leadership team thinks about the people they serve. Not a deck. Contact.

Two questions, built on the fourth of The 5 Steps to Empathy, Integrate into Understanding.

Inward. Pick one opinion you hold about a group of people you don't have a close relationship with anyone from. Notice, honestly, where it came from. A person you know? A feed you scroll? A stereotype, or one past experience? Then ask yourself: how could I hold the way they move through the world as equal to mine, and worth being curious about?

Outward. This one may take longer than a week. Put yourself in a room, in person or on a video call, with one person whose life or views are genuinely different from yours. Not to change their mind. Not to change yours. Just to actually meet them, the way a bench and a sea of yellow signs asked a whole city to meet us, one stranger at a time. What would that actually look like for you?

I'd like to hear how it goes. Reply to this email or leave a comment.

Listen to the episode. Maria and I get into the animal research, and the honest question of whether humans share any moral ground at all: Episode 5 of What Does It Mean to Be Human.

Spotify

Apple Podcasts

I had a really fun conversation as a guest on the Collaborative Culture podcast with Dr. Kristine Gentry and Monica M. Smith, talking about empathy with backbone, how you hold a hard conversation about performance without dropping either accountability or humanity. It's the workplace version of everything above. Listen here.

And if someone forwarded this to you, you can subscribe at readingbetweenthelines.beehiiv.com.

 Stay curious. Ask good questions. Let empathy follow.

Rob